Amos 1
Amos 1
SEM Assumptions
A Reasonable Sample Size
a good rule of thumb is 15 cases per
predictor in a standard ordinary least squares
multiple regression analysis.
[ Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social
Sciences, by James Stevens]
Listwise
Pairwise
Mean substitution
Regression methods
Expectation Maximization (EM) approach
Full Information Maximum Likelihood (FIML)**
Multiple imputation(MI)**
SEM Software
Several different packages exist
EQS, LISREL, MPLUS, AMOS,
AMOS SAS, ...
Introduction to
AMOS
AMOS Advantages
Easy to use for visual SEM
( Structural Equation Modeling).
Easy to modify, view the model
Publication quality graphics
AMOS Components
AMOS Graphics
draw SEM graphs
runs SEM models using graphs
AMOS Basic
runs SEM models using syntax
Access
dBase 3 5
DATASET:
AMOS_data_valid_condom.sav
Drawing in AMOS
Drawing in AMOS
To draw a path, Click Diagram
Diagram on the top menu
and click Draw Path.
Path
Instead of using the top menu, you may use the
Tool Box buttons to draw arrows (
and
).
Drawing in AMOS
To draw Error Term to the observed and
unobserved variables.
Use Unique Variable
Variable button in the Tool Box.
Click
and then click a box or a circle to
which you want to add errors or a unique
variables.(When you use "Unique Variable" button, the
path coefficient will be automatically constrained to 1.)
Drawing in AMOS
Let us draw:
OR
Click on the Text tab and
enter the name of the
variable in the Variable
name field:
SEX1
FRBEHB1
ISSUEB1
eiss
efr1
SXPYRC1
1
eSXPYRC1
Performing the
analysis in AMOS
View/Set Analysis
Properties and click
on the Output tab.
There is also an
Analysis Properties
icon you can click on
the toolbar. Either
way, the Output tab
gives you the
following options:
Results
<--<--<--<--<--<---
SEX1
SEX1
IDM
IDM
ISSUEB1
FRBEHB1
Estimate
-.28
.30
-.38
-.57
.16
.49
S.E.
.09
.08
.11
.10
.05
.04
C.R.
-2.98
3.79
-3.29
-5.94
3.42
12.21
P
.00
***
***
***
***
***
<--<--<--<--<--<---
SEX1
SEX1
IDM
IDM
ISSUEB1
FRBEHB1
Estimate
-.10
.12
-.11
-.19
.11
.38
SEX1
<-->
Estimate
S.E.
C.R.
-.02
.01
-2.48
.01
IDM
<-->
IDM
-.08
Label
-.08
.17
.25
Unstandardized
IDM
SEX1
-.57
Standardized
IDM
SEX1
-.19
-.28
-.38
-.10
-.11
.30
.12
.02
FRBEHB1
efr1
FRBEHB1
ISSUEB1
1.94
1
1
.49
SXPYRC1
1
2.80
eSXPYRC1
ISSUEB1
1.36
eiss
.16
.06
efr1
.38
eiss
.11
.15
SXPYRC1
eSXPYRC1
<-->
efr1
Chi-square
decrease
9.909
Par Change
.171
Parameter
increase
-.02
1.45, .25
IDM
SEX1
-.57
-.38
5.58
0, 1.94
1
efr1
-.28
.30
3.74
FRBEHB1
.49
ISSUEB1
1
.16
.17
3.08
SXPYRC1
1
0, 2.80
eSXPYRC1
0, 1.36
eiss
IDM
SEX1
-.18
-.09
-.10
.12
.02
.05
FRBEHB1
efr1
ISSUEB1
.37
eiss
.08
.14
SXPYRC1
eSXPYRC1
0,
0,
e2
1
0,
e3
0,
e4
IDMA1R IDMC1R
IDME1R
1
IDMJ1R
idm1
0,
e2
e3
.30
IDMA1R
.26
IDMC1R
.55
.51
idm1
e4
.47
IDME1R
.69
.47
IDMJ1R
.69
Factor
Loading
s
0, e2
e2
0, e3
0, e4
e3
e4
IDMA1R IDMC1R
1
IDME1R
0,
idm1
IDMJ1R
0, .48
e1
0, .48
e2
e3
1
2.18
IDMA1R
IDMC1R
1.00
IDME1R
1.15
1.50
2.28
IDMJ1R
1.36
0, .19
idm1
Chi-square = 56.826,
df=5, p=0.000
0, .47
e2
1
2.24
0, .58
e1
e4
1
2.44
0, .45
0, .48
e3
1
2.18
IDMA1R
e4
1
2.44
1
2.24
IDMC1R
1.00
0, .43
IDME1R
1.03
1.48
0, .19
idm1
Chi-square =
11.621, df=3,
p=0.003
2.28
IDMJ1R
1.40
Chi-squaredifference=56.826-11.621=45.205
df=5-3=2
Chi-squarecritical value=5.99 Significant
DF
CMIN
3 45.205 .000
NFI
Delta-1
.026
IFI
RFI TLI
Delta-2 rho-1 rho2
.026 .032 .032
0, .47
1
2.60
1
2.39
0, .44
0, .39
1
2.43
1
2.21
IDMA1R
IDMC1R
IDME1R
IDMJ1R
1
2.41
1
2.36
1
2.40
IDMA1R
IDMC1R
IDME1R
IDMJ1R
1.58 1.41
1.00 1.04
0, .18
1.56 1.45
1.00 1.14
0, .16
Impulsive
Impulsive
-.64
-.62
2.72
FRBEHB1
4.12
ISSUEB1
0, 2.12
1
0, 1.50
eiss
.11
ISSUEB1
0, 1.81
1
efr1
.62
eiss
.26
2.16
SXPYRC1
SXPYRC1
1
0, 2.95
eSXPYRC1
UNCONSTRAINED MODEL
0, 1.13
3.63
Boys
3.06
FRBEHB1
1
.40
-.38
-.28
4.35
efr1
0, .62
0, 2.56
eSXPYRC1
Girls
eidm1
0, .64
eidm2
1
2.33
IDMA1R
0, .48
eidm3
1
2.60
IDMC1R
1
2.21
eidm4
1
2.39
IDME1R
eidm1
0, .46
1
2.43
0, .63
eidm2
1
2.41
1
2.40
1.57
1.08
1.42
1.42
1.00
1.00
Impulsive
Impulsive
0, .16
0, .18
-.50
-.45
2.72
FRBEHB1
4.12
ISSUEB1
1
0, 2.14
.11
ISSUEB1
0, 1.51
eiss
efr1
3.62
3.06
FRBEHB1
1
.40
-.50
-.45
4.35
efr1
1
2.36
0, .40
eidm4
IDMJ1R
1.57
1.08
0, .43
eidm3
0, 1.81
.62
.26
0, 2.95
SXPYRC1
eSXPYRC1
Boys
eiss
2.16
SXPYRC1
1
0, 1.12
0, 2.56
eSXPYRC1
min
max
skew
c.r.
kurtosis
c.r.
IDM
1.182
3.727
.381
4.649
.496
3.025
SEX1
1.000
2.000
.182
2.222
-1.967
-11.997
FRBEHB1
1.000
6.000
-.430
-5.245
-.778
-4.748
ISSUEB1
1.000
4.000
-.431
-5.259
-1.387
-8.462
SXPYRC1
2.000
7.000
-.937
-11.436
-.715
-4.360
-3.443
-6.149
Multivariate
Handling non-continuous
data:
Bootstrapping
Use Bootstrapping
Bootstrapping generates an estimate of the sampling
distribution from the available data and computes the
p-values and construct confidence intervals.
Bootstrapping in AMOS generates random covariance
matrices from the sample covariance matrix assuming
multivariate normality
Handling non-continuous
data:
Bootstrapping
Bootstrapping is useful for estimating standard errors
for statistics with complex distributions, for which there
is no practical approximate
However, Some limitations include:
The population in nonparametric bootstrapping is merely
the researchers sample
If the researchers sample is small, unrepresentative, or the
observations are not independent, resembling from it can
magnify
the effects of these features (see Rodgers, 1999)
Bootstrap analyses are probably biased in small samples
(just as
they are in other methods)that is, bootstrapping is not a
cure
BOLLEN_STINE BOOTSTRAP
performed only for dataset
without any missing values
(see handout #6:
amos_data_valid_condom.sav)
The model fits better than expected in 496 samples out of 500 samples
(500-496)/500=0.010
So, p-value=0.01 < 0.05 - Model does not fit to the data very well
Bootstrap estimates
Relationship between
Condom use and Peer
Norms about
Condom is 0.487,
with S.E.=0.04,
Almost the same
estimate produced
by Bootstrap, 0.488
with S.e=0.042
Thank You!
3.841
5.991
7.815
9.488
11.070
12.592
14.067
15.507
16.919
10
18.307
11
19.675