Multifocal Iols: DR Arpita

MULTIFOCAL IOLS
DR ARPITA
IOLS AND NEAR VISION

Conventional IOL is a single focus
device
which gives maximum visual acuity
only at a distinct distance
A number of solutions have been put
forward which will allow patient with
an IOL to see clearly distance as well
as near
1)Implantation of an emmetropic
IOL with use of reading glasses
2)A small amount of myopic
astigmatism i.e refractive error of
about -0.75DC to -1.25 DC would
allow uncorrected visual acuity of
about 6/12 for distance and near
3)Monovision approach dominant
eye to be emmetropic for distance
vision and other eye made myopic by
2.5 to 3D for near vision
Inherent limitation - loss of

stereopsis, which is not well
accepted in most patients
4) Multifocal IOLs is an attempt to
provide both distance and near vision
without need for spectacle correction
5) Accomodative IOLs
MUTIFOCAL IOLS - HISTORY

Hoffer in 1982 was the first to hit
upon the idea of a multifocal IOL after
observing a patient who had 6/6
vision in spite of an IOL that was
decentred by more than 50% of the
pupillary area
The credit goes to Dr. John Pierce in
1986 who was to implant the bulls
eye style of the multifocal IOL.
DEFINITION
Single IOL with two or more focal
points.
Types
Refractive
Diffractive
Combination of both
REFRACTIVE MFIOLS
Concentric rings of different powers
1) Two zone lenses
2) Annulus type lens / Bulls eye lens
TWO ZONE LENSES

Central near vision segment surrounded by
distance vision segment
Central section 2mm in diameter since
pupil constricts during near vision
When pupil dilates during distance viewing
peripheral distance segment is exposed
Disadvantage- in bright sunlight
Poorly tolerated by pts enjoying outdoor
sports
ANNULUS TYPE OR BULLS

EYE LENS
Central most portion distance vision
Surrounded by near vision ring
Surrounded by another distance vision ring
Marked pupillary constriction allows distance
vision,mild constriction allows distance and near
,all 3 segments exposed when pupil is dilated
Excessive constriction during reading in bright
light blocks near ring prevents clear near vision
DIFFRACTIVE MFIOLS
This IOL utilizes the principle of
diffraction in conjunction with
refraction to create two foci.
The basic refractive power is
provided by the anterior aspheric
surface and the diffractive power
comes from the multiple grooves on
its posterior surface
DIFFRACTIVE MFIOLS
41% of light is focused for distance

vision and another 41% is focused for
near vision
The remaining portion of light is
distributed to higher orders of diffraction
Since this lens has a diffractive optical
effect present at all points of the lens,
even if the lens is decentred or the pupil is
eccentric or deformed, lens will always
supply power for distance and near vision.
Thus diffractive IOLs are pupil
independent.
FOLDABLE MFIOL
First FDA approved foldable MFIOL
was the silicone AMO Array lens
It is divided into 5 concentric zones
on its anterior surface with varying
optical powers such that light
distribution with a typical pupil size is
approximately 50% for distance ,
37% for near and 15% for
intermediate vision
Silicone AMO Array lens
This lens had a near additions of 3.5D

at the IOL plane and 2.1D at the
spectacle plane.
The lens had a major limitation of
being pupil dependent (ideal sizeabout 3-3.5 mm). The average pupil
size in Indian eyes is small, specially
when associated with senile miosis.
So the Array lens did not suit the
Indian eyes very well.
ReZoom lens
Foldable acrylic MFIOL from AMO

Zones 1,3,5-distant dominant
Zones 2,4 near dominant
Expansion of zone 1 and 3 such that
60% of incoming light is for distance
and 40% for near and intermediate
TRIPLE EDGE DESIGN
ASPHERIC TRANSITION
The main limitation of multifocals are

the presence of glare/halos and
reduced contrast sensitivity, which is
seen to improve with bilateral
implantation, because of a
bilateral summation effect.
Based on the idea of bilateral

summation the Acri-Tec foldable
intraocular lens was introduced.
This is a foldable silicone, bifocal
diffraction IOL.
There are two models one is near
dominant (733 D) with 70% of light for
near and 30% of light for distance
focus and the second is distant
dominant (737D ) with 70% of light for
distance focus and 30% for near focus
With their implantation there is nearly 100%

of light for near and distance bilaterally
therefore a considerable improvement in
contrast sensitivity.
Due to specific edge design of the lens with
fresnel structure contributing to the total
refractive power, this lens is extra thin. The
anterior surface of the multifocal lens
contains the diffractive optic providing the
lens with a near addition of +4.0 diopters
Tecnis IOL (AMO)

The Tecnis IOL represents the first
IOL that has a wavefront
designed , modified prolate ,
anterior-surface optic that
neutralizes the positive spherical
aberration of the human cornea.
ReSTOR IOL (Alcon).

The most recently introduced is the
AcrySof ReSTOR apodized diffractive IOL
The unique feature of the ReSTOR
lens is the apodized diffractive optics
The term apodisation derives from
Greek, literally meaning cutting feet off
The concept of apodization means a
gradual transition of optical properties
from the center of a lens to the edge.
In this case there are a series of twelve diffractive

rings over the central 3.6 millimeters of the lens
optic.
The inner most ring has a step height of 1.3
microns with subsequent rings gradually
decreasing in height until the outer ring with a
height of 0.2 microns. The inner rings are further
apart and the distance between rings gradually
decreases toward the periphery
The add power is 4.0 D at the IOL plane and 3.2 D
at the spectacle plane.
Distributes the appropriate amount of light to near
and distant focal points, regard less of the lighting
situation resulting a better quality of vision.
AcrySof IQ ReSTOR Multifocal

Toric
Single solution for presbyopic
patients who also present with some
astigmatism.
In addition to its diffractive
multifocality and its toric correction,
the lens is aspheric, uses a singlepiece design and has UV and bluelight filters built in
0.5-3D of astigmatism
Pre-operative
Considerations
The Patient should have a strong
desire to be spectacle
independent. This is the single
most important indication for
multifocal lens surgery.
Age- By and large, it would be better
to operate within the age group 35 to
75.
Functional & Occupational

Requirements - A detailed history on
this point is most crucial. Does the
patient have any hobbies like painting,
playing the piano, playing cards or
billiards or is he just the unusual avid
reader?
Patients often complain of the difficulty
in MULTI TASKING post IOL surgery with
monofocal lens implant. This category
of patients are the ones to target for.
Pre-existing Ocular Pathologies- One

has to rule out the possibility of
preexisting ocular diseases like
ARMD,GLAUCOMA etc. more so in these
cases as these are visually and
surgically demanding cases where
the real benefits of multifocality may
not be produced or appreciated by
the patients.
Secondly a partial contrast loss due to
the multifocal lenses may add on the
visual handicap of the patient
Hypercritical & Demanding PatientsThis class of patients should be strictly

avoided.
One should prefer to operate on those
patients who trust their surgeons skills and
capability
It is better to avoid proving ourselves to a
cynical and suspecting patient who remains
unhappy no matter how best we perform.
Such are the patients who will remain more
bothered with the halos and mild transient
glare which may be present initially.
Strong urge for near reading

without glasses These avid
readers will be very happy with the
apodised diffractive multifocal which
has very good unaided near vision
especially in bilateral lens implants
Occupational night drivers For all

these patients even a short term
glare or halo effect will be
intolerable.
Counselling these patients and
explaining them about potential side
effects and also the fact that they
are easily tolerable with binocular
summation and lessen with time is
very crucial
Intra-operative Exclusion
Criterias
1. Significant vitreous loss during
surgery
2. Pupil trauma during surgery
3. Zonular damage
4. Capsulorhexis tear
5. Capsular rupture
Medical Exclusion
Patients with more than 1.0 D of
corneal astigmatism
Individuals with a monofocal lens in
one eye
History of previous Refractive
Surgery
Keys for Successful Multifocal

IOL Implantation
Patient Selection- The right patient is to be
selected
Accurate Biometry- IOL master strongly
recommended as optical biometry is
approximetely 10 times more exact. Use of
immersion biometry , would be better choice
than applanation biometry. Cross-checking
by 2 technicians, clinical correlation with
present or past refractive error and
comparison with fellow eye is suggested
Power Calculation- Maximize visual

outcomes by calculating for a postoperative refractive spherical equivalent
from Plano to <+0.25. Use of newer
formulae like SRK-T and Holladay are
helpful.
Surgical Technique - The following are
helpful in achieving good results-Round,
centered CCC completely overlapping the
Lens Optic, removal of all viscoelastic from
behind the lens and proper positioning of
lens in capsular bag.
DISADVANTAGES OF MFIOLS
1) Light intensity entering the eye is
halved
In bulls eye lenses amount of light transmitted
for each of focal length varies with pupil size
Thus distant and near objects may be of
different intensities
In diffractive lenses image intensity is equal for
distance and near vision but even in ideal
situation only one half of light entering eye is
in focus
2) Contrast sensitivity is
decreased because of decreased
intensity of light focussed
Even more light may be lost due to
scattering
Thus pts with MFIOL require brighter
light to read well and generally
function less well in dim light
3) Off axis aberrations in

decentred IOLS cause more problems
in MFIOLS as compared to
conventional IOLS
Although both bulls eye and
diffractive IOLS require excellent
centration ,it is more critical with
diffractive lenses since they suffer
stronger off axis aberration

Multifocal Iols: DR Arpita

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Multifocal Iols: DR Arpita

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Multifocal Iols: DR Arpita

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

MULTIFOCAL IOLS

IOLS AND NEAR VISION

Inherent limitation - loss of

MUTIFOCAL IOLS - HISTORY

TWO ZONE LENSES

ANNULUS TYPE OR BULLS

41% of light is focused for distance

Silicone AMO Array lens

This lens had a near additions of 3.5D

Foldable acrylic MFIOL from AMO

The main limitation of multifocals are

Based on the idea of bilateral

With their implantation there is nearly 100%

Tecnis IOL (AMO)

ReSTOR IOL (Alcon).

In this case there are a series of twelve diffractive

AcrySof IQ ReSTOR Multifocal

Functional & Occupational

Pre-existing Ocular Pathologies- One

Hypercritical & Demanding PatientsThis class of patients should be strictly

Strong urge for near reading

Occupational night drivers For all

Keys for Successful Multifocal

Power Calculation- Maximize visual

3) Off axis aberrations in

You might also like