This document discusses factors to consider when selecting a bridge type, including span length determination, bridge material selection, and structural types. Continuous reinforced concrete bridges have advantages like reduced piers, bearings, and expansion joints, providing better strength and lower lifetime costs compared to simple span bridges. Concrete bridges can be adapted to various loads but are heavier, while steel bridges are lighter and faster to construct but require more maintenance due to corrosion. Selection depends on site conditions, traffic needs, constructability, and lifetime costs.
This document discusses factors to consider when selecting a bridge type, including span length determination, bridge material selection, and structural types. Continuous reinforced concrete bridges have advantages like reduced piers, bearings, and expansion joints, providing better strength and lower lifetime costs compared to simple span bridges. Concrete bridges can be adapted to various loads but are heavier, while steel bridges are lighter and faster to construct but require more maintenance due to corrosion. Selection depends on site conditions, traffic needs, constructability, and lifetime costs.
This document discusses factors to consider when selecting a bridge type, including span length determination, bridge material selection, and structural types. Continuous reinforced concrete bridges have advantages like reduced piers, bearings, and expansion joints, providing better strength and lower lifetime costs compared to simple span bridges. Concrete bridges can be adapted to various loads but are heavier, while steel bridges are lighter and faster to construct but require more maintenance due to corrosion. Selection depends on site conditions, traffic needs, constructability, and lifetime costs.
This document discusses factors to consider when selecting a bridge type, including span length determination, bridge material selection, and structural types. Continuous reinforced concrete bridges have advantages like reduced piers, bearings, and expansion joints, providing better strength and lower lifetime costs compared to simple span bridges. Concrete bridges can be adapted to various loads but are heavier, while steel bridges are lighter and faster to construct but require more maintenance due to corrosion. Selection depends on site conditions, traffic needs, constructability, and lifetime costs.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 8
Part 2-Bridge Construction
1 1- Introduction & Investigation
1.2. Investigation for Bridge 12 1.2.4. Span Determination A. EconomicSpan: Min span length where cost of superstructure = Cost of substructure. B. Hydraulic Requirement: bridges are designed to accommodate design discharge at design flood. C. Location of Piers: Piers should be located to cause minimum obstruction to flow D. Free Board: water way belowsuperstructure should be designed to pass design flood & floating debris with back water effect. 50 2.2. Selection of Bridge Types a. Geometric condition of the site (Road Alignment, Design flood and highest water mark) b. Aesthetics, c. Traffic capacity, d. Need for future widening, e. Structural stability, f. Foundation (sub-surface) conditions, and strength of abutments. g. Erection procedures, h. Available Material i. Knowledge(skill) and Equipment(capacity) of the contractor j. Clearance requirement above and below the road way k. General civic requirements with respect to location, financing and community values. 51 2.2. Selection of Bridge Types For Curved Bridges continuous box girder and slab bridges are good choices because They have pleasing appearance Can readily be built on a curve Have relatively high torsional resistance 2.2. Selection of Bridge Types 52 Continuous reinforced concrete bridge Less number of bearings than simply supported bridge since on line of bearings are used over the piers. Reduced width of pier, thus less flow obstruction and less amount of material. Requires less number of expansion joints due to which both the initial cost and maintenance cost become less. Better architectural appearance. Lesser Vibration and deflection. Additional strength from moment redistribution due to continuity & rigid. Smaller cross section of bridge components both superstructure & sub structure Analysis is laborious and time consuming. 2.2. Selection of Bridge Types 53 Simple Span reinforced concrete bridge Elastic moment capacities are used for design resulting in large cross sections Analysis and design is simple High maintenance cost Many construction joints at the discontinuities 2.2. Selection of Bridge Types 54 Concrete Construction Advantage Adaptable to wide variety of structural shapes and loads Low cost of maintenance (less than 1% of construction cost per year). Long life and better resistance to temporary overloads and dynamic loads than steel bridges. Cast-in-place reinforced concrete structure are continuous and monolithic Easy construction, low cost and good seismic resistance. They can also be given the desired aesthetic appearance. Disadvantage Large dead weight that require large foundation Difficulty to widen or rebuild Longer construction time Expensive formwork and false work 2.2. Selection of Bridge Types 55 Steel Construction Advantage Steel bridges can be built faster than reinforced concrete or pre stressed concrete bridge. They can be erected with ease and this minimizing construction costs. Steel superstructures are usually lighter than concrete superstructures which translate into reduced substructures costs, which can be significant when soil conditions are poor. Steel superstructures can be designed with shallower depth than RC, which is an important consideration when overhead clearance is required. Steel bridges are easy and faster to repair than RC. Disadvantage Corrosion of steel is the major drawback which requires prohibitively high maintenance cost. Corrosion can reduce cross section of structural members and weaken the superstructure. The second disadvantage is that steel fatigues under repeated loading (its strength decreases under repeated loading at high number of cycles of loading)