Brick Bond
Brick Bond
Brick Bond
CONSTRUCTION
CONCAVE
VEE
FLUSH
RAKED
STRIPPED
STRUCK
RULES FOR BONDING
Rule-1
The bricks should be of uniform size. The length of the brick should be
twice its width plus one joint, so that uniform lap is obtained. Good bond is
not possible if lap is non-uniform.
Rule-2
The amount of lap should be minimum ¼ brick length along the length of
the wall and ½ brick length across the thickness of the wall.
Rule-3
Avoid using brick bats unless it is necessary or required in special locations.
Rule-4
In alternate courses, the center line of header should coincide with the
center line of the stretcher, in the course below or above it.
Rule-5
The vertical joints in the alternate courses should be along
the same vertical axis.
Rule-6
The stretcher should be used only in the facing; they
should not be used in the hearting. Hearting should be
done in headers only.
Rule-7
It is preferable to provide every sixth course as a header
course on both the sides of the wall.
TYPES OF BONDS
1) Stretching Bond
2) Heading Bond
3) English Bond
4) Flemish Bond (i) Double Flemish Bond
(ii) Single Flemish Bond
1.STRETCHING BOND
The bond in which all the bricks are laid as stretchers in
every course is called "Stretching bond”.
2.HEADING BOND
disadvantages.
Sr
No. English Bonds Flemish bond
1 This bond consists of headers and stretchers This bond consists of headers and
laid in alternative courses. stretchers laid alternatively in each
course.
2 It is strongest of all the bonds. It is less strong for walls having
thickness more than 30cm.
3 It provides rough appearance especially for It provides good appearance for all
one brick thick walls. thickness of walls.
4 There are no noticeable continuous vertical There are partly continuous vertical
joints in the structure built in this bond. joints in the structure built in this bond.
5 Much attention is not required in providing Special attention is required in providing
this bond. this bond.
6 Progress of work is more. Progress of work is less.
COMPARISON BETWEEN BRICK MASONARY AND STONE
MASONARY
(1) Stone is stronger and more durable than brick and for
public buildings; it is decidedly more suitable than brick. It
reflects strength in every inch of it. It is in tune with
nature. Its color improves and looks more serene with age.
On the other hand, brick is an artificial product made as a
copy of stone. It is flimsy material and plastering is only a
camouflage for its defects.
(2) Stone is water proof. On the other hand, Brick
absorbs moisture and with dampness certain salts rise in
the walls from the ground and cause disintegration of
bricks.
Especially brick should not be allowed to come in contact
with sewage and in such places it must always be covered
with cement plaster or any other protective coat.
(3) Brick offers greater facility for ornamental work in
plaster as a rough shape can first be given to it by means of
any tool. This is not so in case of stones.
(4) Plaster does not stick so well to stones as it does to
brick.
(5) On account of the regular shape and uniform size of brick,
a proper bond can be obtained with comparative ease.
(6) Due to the handy size of brick, brick masonary can be
more rapidly constructed than stone masonary.
(7) Brick wall requires a fixed quantity of mortar and
even with careless masons, the regular shape of the brick
considerably reduces the possibility of hollows being left in
the body of the wall. This is not so with some stone walls.