Submarine GAS HYDRATES Reservoirs

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 31

SUGAR

Submarine Gas Hydrate Reservoirs:


Exploration, Exploitation and Gas Transport

CO2 CH4

Klaus Wallmann and Jörg Bialas


Hydrate Structure

Water molecules CH4  5.7 H2O

Gas molecules
Methane Hydrate Stability

Gas

Hydrate

Tishchenko, Hensen, Wallmann & Wong (2005)


Buffett & Archer (2004)
Global Methane Hydrate Distribution
Observations

Source: Makogan et al., 2007


Global Methane Hydrate Distribution
Modeling

Source: Klauda & Sandler (2005)


Global Methane Hydrate Inventory in the Seabed

Klau.
(2005)
Kven.
(1999)

Buff.
(2004) Best estimate
Mil.
3000 ± 2000
(2004)
Gt C
Global Methane Hydrate Inventory

Coal Oil Gas Hydrate

Source: Energy Outlook 2007, Buffett & Archer (2004)


Coal, oil, gas: reserves economically exploitable at current market prices
Gas Hydrates: total marine inventory
Hydrate Exploitation

Methane gas may be produced from hydrate


deposits via:

• Pressure reduction

• Temperature increase

• Addition of chemicals (incl. CO2)


Hydrate Exploitation
Energy balance for Blake Ridge (Makogon et al. 2007)
2000 m water depth, two ~3 m thick hydrate layers

~40 % of the potential energy can be used for


energy production

~60 % of the potential energy is lost during development,


gas production, gas pressurization and transport

Japanese Hydrate Exploitation Program

Hydrate exploitation is economically feasible at


an oil price of ~54 $/barrel
Gas Hydrates at the Chinese Continental Slope,
South China Sea

Source: N. Wu (2007, pers. comm.)


Gas Hydrates at the Indian Continental Slope

Source: M. V. Lall (2007, pers. comm.)


Storage of CO2 below the Seabed

SUGAR

Safety, Costs
Phase Diagram of CO2

Risk of leakage
decreases with
water depth

Self-sealing
at >350 m
Natural Seepage at the Seafloor
-Black Sea Gas Seeps-

Source: Naudts et al. (2006)


The SUGAR Project

• Funded by German Federal Ministries (BMWi, BMBF)

• Funding period: June 2008 – May 2011

• Total funding: ~13 Mio € (incl. support by industries)


The SUGAR Project

Prospection A: Exploration
A1: Hydroacoustics

Exploration A2: Geophysics


A3: Autoclave-Drilling
A4: Basin Modeling
Quantification

B: Exploitation and Transport


Exploitation/ B1: Reservoir Modeling
CO2 Storage
B2: Laboratory Experiments
B3: Gas Transport
Pellet
Transport
SUGAR Partners
Project Academia Industries
A1 IFM-GEOMAR, University of L3 Communications ELAC Nautik
Bremen GmbH

A2 IFM-GEOMAR, BGR Hannover K.U.M. Umwelt- und Meerestechnik


GmbH, Magson GmbH, SEND
Offshore GmbH

A3 University of Bremen, TU PRAKLA Bohrtechnik GmbH


Clausthal

A4 IFM-GEOMAR IES, TEEC


B1 Fraunhofer UMSICHT, GFZ Wintershall, Wirth GmbH
Potsdam, IFM-GEOMAR

B2 FH Kiel, GFZ Potsdam, BASF, CONTROS GmbH, R&D


Fraunhofer UMSICHT, IOW, Center at FH Kiel, 24sieben
IFM-GEOMAR Stadtwerke Kiel AG, RWE Dea,
Wintershall, E.ON Ruhrgas AG

B3 IOW, FH Kiel Linde AG, Aker Yards, Lindenau


Schiffswerft, Germanischer Lloyd,
BASF
A1: Hydro-acoustic detection of hydrate deposits

- Hydrate deposits are usually formed by gas bubble ascent


- Multi-beam echo-sounders will be further developed and
used for flare imaging and hydrate location

Hydrate Ridge off Oregon


A2: Geo-acoustic imaging of hydrate deposits
A2: Electro-magnetic imaging of hydrate deposits

Joint inversion of seismic and electro-magnetic data


A3: Autoclave-drilling technology

- develop autoclave technology for MeBo


- develop tool for formation independent drilling
A4: Basin Modeling

IFM-GEOMAR

PetroMod3D (IES)
B1, B2: Exploitation
Reservoir modeling and lab experiments
Hydrate Stability in Seawater (CO2 and CH4)

Duan &
Sun (2006)

CO2 hydrates are thermodynamically more stable than CH 4 hydrates


CH4(g)-Recovery from Hydrates Exposed to CO2

CO2(l) after 200 h in sandstone


Kvamme et al. (2007)

CO2(l)
after 400 h
Hiromata et al. (1996)

CO2(g)/N2(g)
after 15 h
Park et al. (2006)

CO2(g)
after 5 h
Lee et al. (2003)
B1, B2: Exploitation

Options
• Addition of CO2(l), only
• Addition of CO2(l) and heat from
- deep and warm formation waters (Schlumberger)
- surface water (UMSICHT, mega pump)
- in-situ methane burning (GFZ)
• Addition of CO2(l) and polymers (BASF)
• Addition of CO2(l) and other gases (IOW)

Exploitation may also be done in two steps


1. Step: Hydrate dissociation
2. Step: Injection of CO2(l) to refill the pore space
previously occupied by methane hydrates
B1, B2: Exploitation

Critical issues that need to be addressed:

• Sluggish kinetics of gas swapping


• Slope stability (avoid steep terrain)
• Integrity of the unconsolidated cap sediments
(overpressure < 10 bar)
• Permeability of reservoir sediments (use sands)
• Clogging by CO2 hydrate formation at the
injection point (add polymers or heat)
• CO2 content of the produced methane gas
(avoid very high temperatures)
B3: Gas Transport

Source: Gudmundsson (NTNU Trondheim), Aker Kvaerner, Mitsui Engineering & Shipbuilding Co.
B3: Gas Transport

Source: Mitsui Engineering & Shipbuilding Co.


SUGAR Technologies
International cooperation

with India, Brasilia, China, Norway, South Korea, US

• to apply the SUGAR exploration techniques

• to perform a field production test during the second


SUGAR phase starting in summer 2011

You might also like