Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark McNeill
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Withdrawn by nom. -DJSasso (talk) 04:02, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Mark McNeill (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable junior player who has yet to meet any of the points of WP:NHOCKEY or WP:GNG. -DJSasso (talk) 21:46, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. —DJSasso (talk) 21:49, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment – The 2011 NHL Entry Draft is going to start on the 24th, well within the period this AfD figures to run. According to what I'm reading on Google News, there's a strong chance this player will be selected in the first round. If that happens, McNeill will meet criterion 5 of WP:NHOCKEY. I won't say the article should be kept now (WP:CRYSTAL and all that), but if he is picked in the first round you can consider this a keep. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 01:11, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:12, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Indeed he will almost certainly meet criterion 5 of WP:NHOCKEY before this AfD has run its course. But even if he doesn't, I believe he has received enough coverage already (largely due to his likely draft status) to meet WP:GNG already. Rlendog (talk) 14:00, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Since the Hawks just picked him in the 1st round. Patken4 (talk) 01:36, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.