Arab vs Burmese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 430,873,383 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Arab communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.552. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arabs within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arabs corresponds to a decrease of 24.0 Burmese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arab and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,336 compared to $113,701, a difference of 16.8%), median household income ($88,398 compared to $103,145, a difference of 16.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,566 compared to $121,444, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 5.3%), householder income under 25 years ($51,219 compared to $54,800, a difference of 7.0%), and median female earnings ($40,718 compared to $44,911, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arab and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 32.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 31.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and single father poverty (16.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arab and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 22.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 17.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arab and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.4% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arab and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.0%), births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 10.7%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.44%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (64.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arab and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 13.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 9.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.92%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 5.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arab and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 25.8%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 21.8%), and master's degree (16.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.15%), 4th grade (97.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.15%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arab and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 18.5%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 13.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 2.5%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 6.2%).