Arab vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,894,087 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Arab communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.198. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arabs within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arabs corresponds to a decrease of 1.4 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arab and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,566 compared to $87,255, a difference of 19.8%), median household income ($88,398 compared to $74,279, a difference of 19.0%), and median family income ($106,952 compared to $90,543, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 6.1%), householder income under 25 years ($51,219 compared to $47,380, a difference of 8.1%), and median female earnings ($40,718 compared to $36,408, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arab and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 31.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 26.5%), and single female poverty (20.7% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.7%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 6.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arab and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 15.8%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.44%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.56%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arab and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.35%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arab and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 30.9%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 22.1%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.16, a difference of 2.3%), family households (64.1% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arab and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.0%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.44%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 0.66%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arab and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 36.5%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 31.1%), and master's degree (16.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.9% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.11%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arab and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 31.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 27.0%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.9%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 10.5%).