Cajun vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,649,030 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Creek within Cajun communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.174. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cajuns within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.023% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cajuns corresponds to a decrease of 23.3 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cajun and Creek communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (33.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 24.9%), median male earnings ($52,325 compared to $46,594, a difference of 12.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,393 compared to $74,847, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,338 compared to $45,371, a difference of 0.070%), householder income over 65 years ($51,397 compared to $51,949, a difference of 1.1%), and median female earnings ($34,034 compared to $33,437, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cajun and Creek communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 21.0%), single father poverty (23.1% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 16.3%), and single male poverty (19.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (24.1% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 0.44%), poverty (15.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.86%), and male poverty (13.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cajun and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (12.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 60.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 23.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.54%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cajun and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.5% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.0% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (75.5% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 0.42%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.1% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cajun and Creek communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (41.0% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 9.0%), divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 7.8%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.17 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.79%), family households (64.8% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.94%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cajun and Creek communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 20.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 13.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.67%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.7% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cajun and Creek communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 8.9%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 7.7%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.030%), 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.040%), and 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cajun and Creek communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 11.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 10.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 2.7%).