Immigrants from Eastern Europe vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,844,797 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Creek within Immigrant from Eastern Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.254. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Europe within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Europe corresponds to a decrease of 2.7 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,662 compared to $74,847, a difference of 39.8%), per capita income ($49,316 compared to $35,546, a difference of 38.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,335 compared to $78,960, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.9%), householder income over 65 years ($62,693 compared to $51,949, a difference of 20.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,572 compared to $45,371, a difference of 22.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Creek communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.1% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 60.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 59.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 49.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.55%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 9.0%), and single father poverty (15.8% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 25.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 26.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 22.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Creek communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.6% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 36.3%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 30.7%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.31%), average family size (3.17 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.86%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 74.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 32.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 6.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.7% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 12.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 25.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Creek communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 69.3%), master's degree (17.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 67.2%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 56.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.3% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 67.7%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 58.0%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 47.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 11.0%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 11.0%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 13.7%).