Carpatho Rusyn vs Immigrants from Russia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,950,079 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Russia within Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.264. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Carpatho Rusyns within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.136% in Immigrants from Russia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Carpatho Rusyns corresponds to a decrease of 135.6 Immigrants from Russia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($49,113 compared to $55,891, a difference of 13.8%), median household income ($86,635 compared to $96,378, a difference of 11.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,777 compared to $113,215, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 3.4%), householder income over 65 years ($61,093 compared to $64,512, a difference of 5.6%), and median family income ($107,502 compared to $116,942, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 27.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 21.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 2.9%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and female poverty (12.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 19.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 16.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 19.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (87.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.40%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 13.8%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and family households with children (25.2% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.0% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.3%), married-couple households (45.7% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 41.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 8.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 48.6%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.6%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.69%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.71%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 32.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 24.3%), and hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.19%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 3.2%).