Carpatho Rusyn vs Immigrants from Scotland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,666,812 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland within Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.493. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Carpatho Rusyns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.906% in Immigrants from Scotland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Carpatho Rusyns corresponds to an increase of 906.0 Immigrants from Scotland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,777 compared to $112,175, a difference of 9.1%), householder income over 65 years ($61,093 compared to $66,620, a difference of 9.0%), and median household income ($86,635 compared to $94,091, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,825 compared to $41,771, a difference of 2.3%), median earnings ($48,617 compared to $50,741, a difference of 4.4%), and wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 15.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 15.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.0% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 2.7%), single female poverty (20.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 8.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.76%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.99%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (87.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.61%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.87%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (45.7% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 7.8%), family households with children (25.2% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 6.5%), and family households (61.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.94%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.98%), and births to unmarried women (30.9% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 28.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 20.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 8.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 18.7%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and college, under 1 year (67.9% compared to 69.4%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (50.6% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 0.10%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.26%), and kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 12.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 7.2%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.35%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.50%), and disability age over 75 (44.8% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 0.71%).