Chickasaw vs Somali Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,560,589 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Somalis within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.476. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Somalis. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 24.1 Somalis.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Somali communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 28.0%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $38,333, a difference of 11.4%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $40,367, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $54,004, a difference of 0.51%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $49,025, a difference of 2.5%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $43,567, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Somali communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (19.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 30.5%), single male poverty (16.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 23.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.010%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Somali communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 29.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 24.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Somali communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 17.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 11.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Somali communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 18.1%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 17.7%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.31%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 5.7%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Somali communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 48.0%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 39.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 15.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 37.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Somali communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 73.3%), bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 38.1%, a difference of 25.5%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.22%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Somali communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 62.3%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 58.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 45.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 7.2%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 7.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.3%).