Chickasaw vs South American Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,957,990 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of South Americans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.467. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.030% in South Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 30.4 South Americans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and South American communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,005 compared to $86,824, a difference of 24.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $100,837, a difference of 22.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $95,362, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 8.5%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $59,854, a difference of 11.4%), and median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $54,492, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and South American communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 36.3%), single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 34.9%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.6%), receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and South American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 19.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.89%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and South American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and South American communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.0%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 16.9%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.63%), currently married (46.6% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and South American communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 33.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 33.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 13.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 25.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and South American communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 40.8%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 39.6%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.020%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 0.56%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and South American communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 67.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 63.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 53.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 9.5%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 10.5%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.6%).