Choctaw vs Scottish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,543,322 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.170. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Scottish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 13.5 Scottish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $102,123, a difference of 24.1%), per capita income ($35,999 compared to $44,440, a difference of 23.4%), and median family income ($84,835 compared to $104,288, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 3.5%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $50,554, a difference of 11.2%), and median female earnings ($33,775 compared to $38,397, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 47.5%), family poverty (11.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 46.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.3% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 16.3%), single father poverty (20.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 16.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 23.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 18.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 10.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.4%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.2%), and births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.59%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.11, a difference of 3.5%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 16.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 1.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 41.1%), master's degree (11.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 37.5%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.39%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.39%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 42.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 32.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 9.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.7%), and disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 12.7%).