Australian vs Scottish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,771,532 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.544. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.370% in Scottish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 370.1 Scottish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $44,440, a difference of 17.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,912 compared to $94,622, a difference of 14.0%), and median family income ($118,440 compared to $104,288, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 3.4%), householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $50,554, a difference of 6.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,891 compared to $61,735, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 12.9%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 10.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.20%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 0.39%), and poverty (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 15.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 9.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.64%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 11.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 7.4%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 6.2%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.50%), average family size (3.13 compared to 3.11, a difference of 0.88%), and family households (62.8% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 49.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 13.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 8.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 29.2%), master's degree (18.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 21.3%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.9% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 0.13%), high school diploma (91.2% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 19.4%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 18.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.9%).