Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 103,122,617 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.145. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.035% in Immigrants from Uzbekistan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to a decrease of 35.0 Immigrants from Uzbekistan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 23.9%), median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $43,363, a difference of 11.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $56,331, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($103,273 compared to $103,197, a difference of 0.070%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,387 compared to $100,523, a difference of 0.86%), and median household income ($84,965 compared to $86,425, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 52.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 51.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 48.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (16.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.3%), single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 30.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 24.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 43.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 10.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 28.0%), births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 24.2%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.52%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (64.6% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 240.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 96.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 81.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 25.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 57.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 81.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 59.3%), master's degree (14.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 23.1%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (65.8% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 0.85%, a difference of 78.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 34.9%), and hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.37%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 0.93%), and ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.4%).