Czechoslovakian vs Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 246,115,337 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.319. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.102% in Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 102.4 Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 13.3%), per capita income ($43,806 compared to $39,403, a difference of 11.2%), and median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $50,488, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($84,965 compared to $84,729, a difference of 0.28%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,387 compared to $98,778, a difference of 2.6%), and median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $37,497, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 25.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.2%), and single father poverty (17.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 0.70%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.0%), unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.8%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.57%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 14.5%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 12.1%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.41, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.5% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.5%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 25.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 11.7%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.30%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 33.3%), master's degree (14.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 25.2%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.57%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.57%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 24.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 11.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.18%), disability (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.29%), and female disability (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.39%).