French Canadian vs Dutch Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,069,451 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.660. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.311% in Dutch. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 311.1 Dutch.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 5.6%), median female earnings ($38,436 compared to $37,339, a difference of 2.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $51,265, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($82,810 compared to $82,971, a difference of 0.19%), median family income ($101,634 compared to $101,192, a difference of 0.44%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,093 compared to $99,650, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 14.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 8.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (22.2% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 0.79%), married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 9.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 9.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and female unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 0.61%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.48%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 0.41%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 31.5%, a difference of 9.2%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.07 compared to 3.11, a difference of 1.1%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (63.7% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 15.9%), no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 61.6%, a difference of 4.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 5.3%), master's degree (14.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and college, under 1 year (64.2% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.070%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.070%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 11.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.8%).