French Canadian vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,187,140 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.343. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.042% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 42.1 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,003 compared to $32,345, a difference of 33.0%), median male earnings ($54,722 compared to $41,758, a difference of 31.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,694 compared to $71,697, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $59,383, a difference of 2.4%), wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 19.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $44,003, a difference of 19.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 55.5%), married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 54.5%), and single male poverty (14.6% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 50.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 8.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 11.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 18.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 126.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 122.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 118.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 27.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 17.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 11.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 36.9%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 21.6%), and currently married (48.0% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.1% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 2.2%), family households (63.7% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and married-couple households (47.5% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 41.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 28.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.45%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 52.8%), master's degree (14.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 40.9%), and no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 47.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 41.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (13.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.42%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability (13.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.6%).