German Russian vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 88,053,312 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within German Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.797. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in German Russians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.224% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 German Russians corresponds to an increase of 224.2 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between German Russian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 14.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,398 compared to $101,387, a difference of 13.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,673 compared to $51,224, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,105 compared to $38,738, a difference of 4.4%), median earnings ($43,200 compared to $46,658, a difference of 8.0%), and per capita income ($40,266 compared to $43,806, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between German Russian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 26.0%), female poverty (14.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 18.2%), and poverty (13.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.7%), single father poverty (17.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and single mother poverty (31.3% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between German Russian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 12.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between German Russian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (42.4% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.94%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between German Russian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.2%), married-couple households (44.0% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 10.3%), and currently married (45.5% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.60%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.88%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between German Russian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 34.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 7.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between German Russian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 13.1%), master's degree (13.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 7.8%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.23%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between German Russian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 9.9%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 8.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.46%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and female disability (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.2%).