Guatemalan vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Guatemalan
Czechoslovakian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Guatemalans
Czechoslovakians
1,497
SOCIAL INDEX
12.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
305th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Czechoslovakian Integration in Guatemalan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 294,361,836 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Guatemalan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.396. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guatemalans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guatemalans corresponds to an increase of 4.9 Czechoslovakians.
Guatemalan vs Czechoslovakian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 24.6%), median male earnings ($46,736 compared to $55,382, a difference of 18.5%), and median family income ($88,295 compared to $103,273, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,525 compared to $51,224, a difference of 0.59%), median female earnings ($35,695 compared to $38,738, a difference of 8.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,526 compared to $60,581, a difference of 11.1%).
Income Metric | Guatemalan | Czechoslovakian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,766 | Average $43,806 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,295 | Average $103,273 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,961 | Average $84,965 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,205 | Average $46,658 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,736 | Good $55,382 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,695 | Poor $38,738 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,525 | Tragic $51,224 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,331 | Average $95,070 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,705 | Good $101,387 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,526 | Average $60,581 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.6% | Tragic 28.2% |
Guatemalan vs Czechoslovakian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 61.8%), family poverty (11.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 46.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 43.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 2.6%), single male poverty (13.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 3.6%).
Poverty Metric | Guatemalan | Czechoslovakian |
Poverty | Tragic 15.3% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Families | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Males | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 12.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.7% | Good 20.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.4% | Fair 13.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.6% | Good 16.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.2% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.1% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.4% | Excellent 15.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 13.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.8% | Fair 21.3% |
Single Fathers | Poor 16.6% | Tragic 17.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 32.9% | Poor 29.7% |
Married Couples | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Guatemalan vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 25.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 24.0%), and unemployment (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 6.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Guatemalan | Czechoslovakian |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.6% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Poor 10.5% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.1% | Average 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Excellent 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Excellent 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.8% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Fair 7.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Fair 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Guatemalan vs Czechoslovakian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 18.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Guatemalan | Czechoslovakian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Tragic 64.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Average 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 35.5% | Exceptional 41.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.3% | Exceptional 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.7% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.7% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.0% | Excellent 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.2% | Good 83.0% |
Guatemalan vs Czechoslovakian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 30.2%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 27.6%), and births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.87%), family households (65.2% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.91%), and family households with children (28.9% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 6.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Guatemalan | Czechoslovakian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.2% | Excellent 64.6% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.9% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.3% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.40 | Tragic 3.13 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.0% | Average 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Currently Married | Tragic 42.9% | Exceptional 48.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.2% | Poor 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 37.1% | Fair 32.0% |
Guatemalan vs Czechoslovakian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 40.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 10.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 2.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 8.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Guatemalan | Czechoslovakian |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 11.0% | Exceptional 7.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 54.1% | Exceptional 59.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.1% | Exceptional 21.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Guatemalan vs Czechoslovakian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 113.4%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 26.9%), and master's degree (11.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.0%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 2.0%).
Education Level Metric | Guatemalan | Czechoslovakian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Tragic 94.8% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 91.1% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Tragic 89.9% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Tragic 87.9% | Exceptional 95.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 86.4% | Exceptional 94.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Exceptional 92.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 82.0% | Exceptional 90.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 78.5% | Exceptional 87.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 56.8% | Good 65.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 51.2% | Average 59.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.5% | Average 46.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.0% | Fair 37.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.7% | Fair 14.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Fair 4.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Fair 1.8% |
Guatemalan vs Czechoslovakian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 26.3%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 23.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.1%), ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.4%).
Disability Metric | Guatemalan | Czechoslovakian |
Disability | Good 11.6% | Tragic 12.5% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Tragic 12.3% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Excellent 5.5% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Excellent 6.4% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.7% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.5% | Good 23.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.0% | Exceptional 46.6% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Fair 2.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 3.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Fair 6.2% | Tragic 6.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Average 2.5% |