Hmong vs Ethiopian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Hmong
Ethiopian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Hmong
Ethiopians
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,266
SOCIAL INDEX
70.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
126th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ethiopian Integration in Hmong Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 22,771,344 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.552. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.822% in Ethiopians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to an increase of 1,821.8 Ethiopians.
Hmong vs Ethiopian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 26.8%), per capita income ($38,120 compared to $46,569, a difference of 22.2%), and median female earnings ($35,498 compared to $43,243, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $53,818, a difference of 9.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,258 compared to $96,824, a difference of 14.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $64,989, a difference of 15.3%).
Income Metric | Hmong | Ethiopian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,120 | Exceptional $46,569 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $91,296 | Exceptional $108,251 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,839 | Exceptional $89,640 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,111 | Exceptional $49,572 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,254 | Excellent $56,243 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,498 | Exceptional $43,243 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,364 | Exceptional $53,818 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $84,258 | Good $96,824 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $88,115 | Excellent $103,736 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,339 | Exceptional $64,989 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.7% | Exceptional 21.8% |
Hmong vs Ethiopian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 27.2%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 17.2%), and single female poverty (23.1% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.58%), child poverty among boys under 16 (16.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
Poverty Metric | Hmong | Ethiopian |
Poverty | Poor 12.8% | Average 12.2% |
Families | Average 9.1% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Poor 11.6% | Average 11.1% |
Females | Fair 13.9% | Good 13.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.0% | Average 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.9% | Exceptional 12.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 18.5% | Excellent 16.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Poor 17.1% | Average 16.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Fair 16.6% | Average 16.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Poor 17.5% | Average 16.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.1% | Exceptional 19.9% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.9% | Exceptional 13.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.2% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Excellent 11.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 10.9% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Hmong vs Ethiopian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 59.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 27.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Hmong | Ethiopian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.1% |
Males | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Exceptional 4.4% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.8% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.3% | Fair 17.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 5.7% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.0% | Excellent 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 3.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 13.7% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Fair 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.5% | Excellent 5.3% |
Hmong vs Ethiopian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 2.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Hmong | Ethiopian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.1% | Exceptional 69.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.9% | Exceptional 82.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.7% | Exceptional 38.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.5% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.7% | Exceptional 86.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.4% | Exceptional 86.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.6% | Exceptional 85.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.7% | Exceptional 84.8% |
Hmong vs Ethiopian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (47.0% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 8.8%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 7.6%), and family households (64.9% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.88%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Hmong | Ethiopian |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Tragic 61.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.6% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Good 47.0% | Tragic 43.2% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.21 | Good 3.24 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Poor 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.4% | Fair 6.5% |
Currently Married | Good 47.1% | Tragic 44.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.3% | Average 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.7% | Exceptional 29.8% |
Hmong vs Ethiopian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 17.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.070%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.95%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 8.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Hmong | Ethiopian |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.4% | Average 10.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Average 89.6% | Average 89.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.8% | Tragic 53.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.0% | Tragic 17.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Hmong vs Ethiopian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 49.6%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 43.0%), and master's degree (13.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.1% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 0.20%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.45%).
Education Level Metric | Hmong | Ethiopian |
No Schooling Completed | Excellent 1.9% | Tragic 2.4% |
Nursery School | Good 98.1% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.1% | Tragic 97.6% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Tragic 97.6% |
2nd Grade | Good 98.0% | Tragic 97.5% |
3rd Grade | Excellent 97.9% | Tragic 97.4% |
4th Grade | Excellent 97.7% | Tragic 97.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 96.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 95.4% |
8th Grade | Excellent 96.1% | Tragic 95.1% |
9th Grade | Excellent 95.2% | Tragic 94.4% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 93.2% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Poor 92.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.3% | Fair 91.0% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.1% | Fair 89.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Poor 84.9% | Good 86.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 63.5% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 57.2% | Exceptional 62.9% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.4% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 34.8% | Exceptional 42.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 18.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Hmong vs Ethiopian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 29.0%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 28.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.84%), cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 3.0%).
Disability Metric | Hmong | Ethiopian |
Disability | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Males | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.1% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.7% | Excellent 22.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.2% | Excellent 46.8% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 17.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Exceptional 2.2% |