Houma vs Swiss Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,778,330 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Swiss within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.069. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Swiss. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to a decrease of 1.9 Swiss.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $103,071, a difference of 43.0%), householder income over 65 years ($44,822 compared to $61,621, a difference of 37.5%), and median family income ($76,188 compared to $104,396, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $55,731, a difference of 10.3%), householder income under 25 years ($44,356 compared to $51,493, a difference of 16.1%), and median earnings ($38,949 compared to $46,315, a difference of 18.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (14.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 89.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (26.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 77.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (24.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 71.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 29.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 40.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 45.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 79.9%), male unemployment (7.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 51.0%), and unemployment (6.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 47.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 21.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 11.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (72.7% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 52.7%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 40.8%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.7% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.76%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.90%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 57.9%), no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 46.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 43.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 12.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 43.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 105.9%), professional degree (2.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 102.0%), and master's degree (7.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 86.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (18.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 61.1%), vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 59.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 56.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 14.4%), cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 15.5%), and hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 19.5%).