Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Swiss Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,049,860 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.393. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.018% in Swiss. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to an increase of 18.2 Swiss.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 31.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,385 compared to $103,071, a difference of 12.8%), and median male earnings ($50,298 compared to $55,731, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,028 compared to $37,904, a difference of 0.33%), median earnings ($43,998 compared to $46,315, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $51,493, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 40.5%), family poverty (10.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 36.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 2.9%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 23.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 20.2%), and unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.6% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 25.2%), married-couple households (43.4% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 15.1%), and currently married (44.3% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.2%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (62.6% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 32.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 24.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 13.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 22.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 105.8%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 15.1%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 44.8%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 20.6%), and cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.12%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.48%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.1%).