Icelander vs Costa Rican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,465,092 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans within Icelander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.297. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Icelanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.062% in Costa Ricans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Icelanders corresponds to an increase of 62.3 Costa Ricans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Icelander and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 8.6%), householder income under 25 years ($51,247 compared to $53,106, a difference of 3.6%), and median male earnings ($55,415 compared to $54,279, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,560 compared to $95,565, a difference of 0.010%), median family income ($104,282 compared to $103,989, a difference of 0.28%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,261 compared to $102,779, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Icelander and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 14.4%), married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.7%), and single father poverty (14.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.52%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and single mother poverty (29.5% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Icelander and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 28.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 14.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.66%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Icelander and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 12.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.33%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Icelander and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 8.6%), births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 7.9%), and family households (63.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.0% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.31%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.46%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 4.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 56.9%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.010%), no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.98%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 56.9%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Icelander and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 26.2%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 11.1%), and professional degree (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.52%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.53%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 16.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 12.9%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.0%), disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.7%).