Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Costa Rican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 246,946,866 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans within Immigrant from Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.066. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Costa Ricans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Asia corresponds to an increase of 1.0 Costa Ricans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($118,056 compared to $95,565, a difference of 23.5%), median male earnings ($66,903 compared to $54,279, a difference of 23.3%), and per capita income ($53,806 compared to $44,090, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 7.0%), householder income under 25 years ($57,123 compared to $53,106, a difference of 7.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,872 compared to $61,638, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 24.7%), receiving food stamps (9.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 24.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.1% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.080%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 24.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 15.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.45%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.65%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.0% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 13.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.8% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.95%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.0% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 30.6%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 27.6%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.0%), family households (64.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 42.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 4.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 56.9%, a difference of 7.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 60.4%), professional degree (6.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 46.9%), and master's degree (20.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (96.7% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.060%), 5th grade (97.0% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and 7th grade (95.6% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 37.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 22.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.2%).