Immigrants from Asia vs Spanish American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 72,702,094 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.182. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Spanish American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to an increase of 3.5 Spanish American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,741 compared to $34,195, a difference of 45.5%), median male earnings ($63,240 compared to $44,010, a difference of 43.7%), and median family income ($118,291 compared to $85,728, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,379 compared to $55,573, a difference of 1.5%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 19.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,594 compared to $53,077, a difference of 27.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 50.8%), married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 45.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 2.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and single male poverty (11.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 27.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 27.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 39.7%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 37.8%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.8% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 0.94%), married-couple households (49.1% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and family households (66.1% compared to 71.2%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 59.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 33.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.75%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 129.0%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 107.5%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 92.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 34.3%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 26.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 5.8%), disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 6.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 8.8%).