Immigrants from Asia vs Hispanic or Latino Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 547,394,142 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Hispanics or Latinos within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.567. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.208% in Hispanics or Latinos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to a decrease of 208.3 Hispanics or Latinos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,741 compared to $35,688, a difference of 39.4%), median family income ($118,291 compared to $85,647, a difference of 38.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,787 compared to $80,515, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 8.4%), householder income under 25 years ($56,379 compared to $50,279, a difference of 12.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,594 compared to $52,832, a difference of 27.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 60.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 54.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 51.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 10.5%), single father poverty (14.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 13.9%), and single male poverty (11.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 24.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 33.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 28.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 7.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 77.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 41.2%), births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 41.0%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.1% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 2.1%), family households with children (28.8% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.41, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 19.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 12.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 84.5%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 73.7%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 68.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.62%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.63%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 35.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 29.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 6.6%), disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 7.6%), and female disability (11.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 13.3%).