Immigrants from Belarus vs Immigrants from Taiwan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 127,966,475 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Taiwan within Immigrant from Belarus communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.245. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belarus within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.051% in Immigrants from Taiwan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belarus corresponds to a decrease of 51.2 Immigrants from Taiwan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,162 compared to $77,051, a difference of 23.9%), median household income ($94,399 compared to $116,460, a difference of 23.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,430 compared to $135,508, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,743 compared to $59,424, a difference of 6.6%), median female earnings ($44,757 compared to $49,256, a difference of 10.1%), and wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 57.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 36.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 7.4%), single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 14.9%), and single male poverty (11.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.6% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 17.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 15.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.4% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.0% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.45%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.2%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 14.1%), and births to unmarried women (25.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (1.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.17 compared to 3.24, a difference of 2.1%), and currently married (48.1% compared to 50.7%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 117.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 58.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 42.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 10.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.9% compared to 59.7%, a difference of 24.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 42.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 43.1%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 27.8%), and master's degree (18.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.4% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.030%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 23.7%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 22.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 4.8%).