Immigrants from Belarus vs Yakama Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Belarus
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Yakama
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Belarus

Yakama

Good
Poor
7,566
SOCIAL INDEX
73.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
113th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,331
SOCIAL INDEX
10.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
315th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Yakama Integration in Immigrants from Belarus Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 12,884,525 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama within Immigrant from Belarus communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.209. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belarus within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in Yakama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belarus corresponds to an increase of 28.7 Yakama.
Immigrants from Belarus Integration in Yakama Communities

Immigrants from Belarus vs Yakama Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,303 compared to $33,009, a difference of 52.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,393 compared to $76,226, a difference of 40.9%), and median male earnings ($62,658 compared to $45,002, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,743 compared to $54,321, a difference of 2.6%), wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 8.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,162 compared to $56,234, a difference of 10.5%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Yakama Income
Income MetricImmigrants from BelarusYakama
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$50,303
Tragic
$33,009
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$114,586
Tragic
$83,932
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$94,399
Tragic
$72,225
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$53,043
Tragic
$39,107
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$62,658
Tragic
$45,002
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,757
Tragic
$33,354
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,743
Exceptional
$54,321
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$107,393
Tragic
$76,226
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,430
Tragic
$86,992
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$62,162
Tragic
$56,234
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.7%
Exceptional
23.7%

Immigrants from Belarus vs Yakama Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 85.9%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 66.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 57.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 14.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 25.8%), and single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 32.8%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Yakama Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from BelarusYakama
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
16.7%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Tragic
15.3%
Females
Excellent
12.8%
Tragic
18.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.5%
Tragic
25.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.0%
Tragic
17.6%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
23.1%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
22.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
21.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
22.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
15.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.3%
Tragic
28.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.8%
Tragic
18.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.4%
Tragic
36.4%
Married Couples
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
9.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
14.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
18.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.5%
Tragic
21.4%

Immigrants from Belarus vs Yakama Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 129.3%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 82.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 80.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.65%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 17.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 20.2%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Yakama Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from BelarusYakama
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
7.3%
Males
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
7.9%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
6.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
15.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.6%
Tragic
22.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
8.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Poor
4.9%
Tragic
8.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Tragic
6.7%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
18.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.4%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Tragic
8.1%

Immigrants from Belarus vs Yakama Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.4% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 10.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.0% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 5.0%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Yakama Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from BelarusYakama
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Good
65.2%
Tragic
62.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Tragic
75.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.4%
Good
36.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.0%
Average
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
80.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.3%
Tragic
80.6%

Immigrants from Belarus vs Yakama Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 125.2%), births to unmarried women (25.6% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 57.3%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 53.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.2% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 4.3%), average family size (3.17 compared to 3.45, a difference of 8.6%), and family households (63.7% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 8.8%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Yakama Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from BelarusYakama
Family Households
Tragic
63.7%
Exceptional
69.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Exceptional
30.8%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.2%
Tragic
45.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.17
Exceptional
3.45
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
8.4%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.1%
Tragic
44.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
25.6%
Tragic
40.3%

Immigrants from Belarus vs Yakama Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 172.8%), no vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 153.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 99.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.3% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 12.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.9% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 35.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 99.6%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Yakama Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from BelarusYakama
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
6.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
83.3%
Exceptional
93.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
47.9%
Exceptional
64.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
31.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
12.9%

Immigrants from Belarus vs Yakama Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 99.7%), bachelor's degree (45.0% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 84.0%), and professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 79.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.4%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Yakama Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from BelarusYakama
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Tragic
3.6%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Tragic
96.6%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Tragic
96.6%
1st Grade
Fair
97.9%
Tragic
96.5%
2nd Grade
Average
97.8%
Tragic
96.4%
3rd Grade
Average
97.7%
Tragic
95.9%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Tragic
95.2%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Tragic
94.8%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Tragic
94.3%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Tragic
91.7%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.0%
Tragic
91.2%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.2%
Tragic
90.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Tragic
86.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.3%
Tragic
85.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.2%
Tragic
82.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.2%
Tragic
80.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.3%
Tragic
74.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.2%
Tragic
52.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.1%
Tragic
46.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
52.8%
Tragic
32.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
45.0%
Tragic
24.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.9%
Tragic
9.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
1.3%

Immigrants from Belarus vs Yakama Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 52.0%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 39.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.00%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 9.0%).
Immigrants from Belarus vs Yakama Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from BelarusYakama
Disability
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
13.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
13.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.0%
Exceptional
1.00%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
13.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.7%
Tragic
29.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.1%
Tragic
51.3%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Tragic
6.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.7%