Immigrants from Cabo Verde vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 5,102,711 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Immigrant from Cabo Verde communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.750. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cabo Verde within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.038% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cabo Verde corresponds to an increase of 37.7 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($46,654 compared to $62,330, a difference of 33.6%), wage/income gap (23.6% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 9.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,542 compared to $90,951, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,009 compared to $49,748, a difference of 0.52%), median female earnings ($38,208 compared to $37,905, a difference of 0.80%), and median earnings ($43,963 compared to $43,393, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (23.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 62.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 52.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (22.8% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 3.6%), single mother poverty (31.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and single father poverty (17.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 90.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 68.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 58.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.64%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (86.2% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.1% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.2% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (78.9% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (44.7% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (9.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 31.0%), married-couple households (36.2% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 20.5%), and currently married (37.8% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.9% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 0.21%), divorced or separated (13.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (3.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 112.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 61.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (43.3% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (81.6% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 5.4%), no vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 18.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (43.3% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 27.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 141.1%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 30.1%), and professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (36.8% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 0.86%), bachelor's degree (29.2% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and master's degree (11.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 78.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.3% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 23.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age over 75 (52.4% compared to 54.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and female disability (14.6% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 4.5%).