Immigrants from Sweden vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 32,284,430 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Immigrant from Sweden communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.108. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sweden within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.206% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sweden corresponds to an increase of 206.0 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($55,582 compared to $39,163, a difference of 41.9%), median household income ($100,699 compared to $76,383, a difference of 31.8%), and median male earnings ($65,406 compared to $49,748, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,621 compared to $51,713, a difference of 3.7%), wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 8.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,722 compared to $62,330, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 58.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 55.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.3% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 4.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 8.3%), and single mother poverty (27.5% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 95.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 94.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 93.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.73%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 25.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.2% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.64%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 62.5%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 36.3%), and births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.5% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (26.5% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.27, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 44.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 31.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 0.10%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 76.1%), master's degree (20.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 75.2%), and doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 67.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.9% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.020%), high school diploma (91.1% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 76.5%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 59.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 58.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.6%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.4%), and disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 54.0%, a difference of 19.5%).