Immigrants from Canada vs Immigrants from Indonesia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 208,092,856 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Indonesia within Immigrant from Canada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.194. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Canada within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.139% in Immigrants from Indonesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Canada corresponds to an increase of 138.9 Immigrants from Indonesia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 9.2%), median household income ($92,029 compared to $97,297, a difference of 5.7%), and median female earnings ($41,373 compared to $43,412, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($60,388 compared to $60,935, a difference of 0.91%), median family income ($112,374 compared to $115,162, a difference of 2.5%), and per capita income ($49,412 compared to $48,195, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 12.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 11.0%), and single male poverty (12.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.2%), female poverty (12.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and poverty (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 18.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 13.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.50%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.51%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 16.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 10.7%), births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 9.9%), and family households with children (26.5% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.4% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.23%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.86%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 15.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 10.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 0.050%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 45.7%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and bachelor's degree (41.7% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.090%), college, under 1 year (69.1% compared to 68.9%, a difference of 0.26%), and college, 1 year or more (63.1% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 29.2%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 24.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.45%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 0.85%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 3.7%).