Immigrants from Canada vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 114,945,673 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Immigrant from Canada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.820. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Canada within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.043% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Canada corresponds to an increase of 42.6 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 12.4%), median male earnings ($60,388 compared to $57,352, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,616 compared to $97,880, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,373 compared to $41,527, a difference of 0.37%), householder income over 65 years ($64,952 compared to $63,643, a difference of 2.1%), and median earnings ($50,192 compared to $48,913, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 4.8%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (15.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.010%), single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and single female poverty (20.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 13.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.10%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.56%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.7% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.4%), family households with children (26.5% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 0.36%), family households (64.0% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.83%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 12.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 13.9%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and bachelor's degree (41.7% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (69.1% compared to 68.9%, a difference of 0.22%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 19.9%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 17.3%), and male disability (11.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 0.90%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 3.3%).