Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Ireland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,513,659 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ireland within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.065% in Immigrants from Ireland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to an increase of 64.8 Immigrants from Ireland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,178 compared to $120,333, a difference of 66.7%), per capita income ($35,720 compared to $56,584, a difference of 58.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($77,850 compared to $122,757, a difference of 57.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.7% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 24.0%), householder income under 25 years ($43,266 compared to $57,075, a difference of 31.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,393 compared to $68,495, a difference of 33.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (22.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 77.8%), child poverty among girls under 16 (22.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 76.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 74.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.8%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 10.8%), and single male poverty (13.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 24.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 19.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 62.2%), single father households (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 37.1%), and births to unmarried women (36.8% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.13, a difference of 3.2%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and family households (59.2% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 36.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 0.22%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 72.9%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 61.7%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 59.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.66%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.66%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 39.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.0% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 28.0%), and cognitive disability (19.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.91%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.9%).