Immigrants from Congo vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,816,271 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.267. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.024% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to an increase of 24.5 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($51,393 compared to $40,550, a difference of 26.7%), householder income under 25 years ($43,266 compared to $34,584, a difference of 25.1%), and median household income ($66,768 compared to $54,644, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.7% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 1.7%), median female earnings ($34,317 compared to $32,500, a difference of 5.6%), and median male earnings ($44,204 compared to $41,715, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 85.1%), single male poverty (13.9% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 81.3%), and receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 62.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.6% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 26.4%), single mother poverty (33.8% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 28.0%), and single female poverty (25.3% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 30.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 100.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 75.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 62.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.91%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 34.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 18.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.8% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 31.0%), single mother households (8.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 12.1%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (39.0% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 1.5%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.32, a difference of 2.8%), and currently married (41.1% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 67.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 36.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.31%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 57.9%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 48.0%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.48%), 10th grade (92.4% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.75%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 52.9%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 46.5%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.90%), cognitive disability (19.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.5%).