Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from the Azores Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,367,259 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from the Azores within Immigrant from Cuba communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.379. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cuba within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.019% in Immigrants from the Azores. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cuba corresponds to an increase of 18.9 Immigrants from the Azores.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($43,461 compared to $53,503, a difference of 23.1%), median family income ($78,249 compared to $95,402, a difference of 21.9%), and wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,374 compared to $52,621, a difference of 4.5%), per capita income ($34,910 compared to $39,608, a difference of 13.5%), and median female earnings ($33,291 compared to $38,573, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 39.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 38.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (18.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 0.90%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and single father poverty (16.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (3.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 47.4%), male unemployment (4.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 45.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.85%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 7.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 38.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.0% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.76%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (15.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 23.9%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 6.1%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.090%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.7%), and married-couple households (44.2% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 33.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 14.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.99%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 27.2%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 15.0%), and bachelor's degree (30.3% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.0% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.17%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.18%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 95.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 59.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 47.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.9%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 50.9%, a difference of 6.7%).