Immigrants from Cuba vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,098,468 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Immigrant from Cuba communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.238. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cuba within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cuba corresponds to a decrease of 1.2 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($78,249 compared to $120,301, a difference of 53.7%), per capita income ($34,910 compared to $52,649, a difference of 50.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($44,735 compared to $67,326, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,374 compared to $52,783, a difference of 4.8%), wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 24.7%), and median female earnings ($33,291 compared to $43,941, a difference of 32.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (20.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 128.3%), married-couple family poverty (7.5% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 91.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 89.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.62%), single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and single female poverty (21.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 15.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (8.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 14.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.85%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 28.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.0% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (41.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 49.5%), single mother households (7.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 42.4%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.11, a difference of 5.1%), and married-couple households (44.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 12.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 8.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 119.0%), no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 82.9%), and master's degree (10.9% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 82.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 27.5%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 25.2%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.8%), disability (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.1%).