Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,977,419 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.959. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.350% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 349.6 Tohono O'odham.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $30,256, a difference of 71.1%), median family income ($116,165 compared to $72,193, a difference of 60.9%), and median male earnings ($62,217 compared to $39,543, a difference of 57.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $45,248, a difference of 20.1%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 23.2%), and median female earnings ($43,571 compared to $33,205, a difference of 31.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 166.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 144.8%), and male poverty (10.0% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 128.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.2% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 35.9%), single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 57.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 62.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 99.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 92.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 87.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 12.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 18.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 16.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 14.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 9.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 88.0%), births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 75.6%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 71.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.7%), family households (63.4% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and family households with children (26.2% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 32.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 2.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 104.5%), master's degree (18.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 91.1%), and bachelor's degree (44.0% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 80.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.35%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 82.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 71.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 67.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 15.8%), cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 18.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 25.3%).