Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Pennsylvania German Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 120,753,704 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pennsylvania Germans within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.595. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.336% in Pennsylvania Germans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 1,335.7 Pennsylvania Germans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $37,842, a difference of 36.8%), median family income ($116,165 compared to $91,763, a difference of 26.6%), and median household income ($95,319 compared to $75,814, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $50,852, a difference of 6.9%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 12.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,914 compared to $91,956, a difference of 21.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 33.9%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 28.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.60%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 53.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 22.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 27.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.3%), births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 19.8%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.7%), currently married (48.4% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 31.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 20.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 58.5%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 1.1%), no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 58.5%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 95.8%), master's degree (18.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 72.7%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 71.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.40%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 63.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 28.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 2.3%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 4.5%).