Immigrants from Denmark vs Immigrants from Zaire Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,267,284 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zaire within Immigrant from Denmark communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.276. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Denmark within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.246% in Immigrants from Zaire. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Denmark corresponds to an increase of 246.4 Immigrants from Zaire.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,363 compared to $78,045, a difference of 41.4%), per capita income ($53,799 compared to $38,848, a difference of 38.5%), and median male earnings ($64,625 compared to $47,070, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,612 compared to $45,529, a difference of 15.6%), median female earnings ($43,646 compared to $36,017, a difference of 21.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($68,801 compared to $54,512, a difference of 26.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 39.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 34.8%), and family poverty (8.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.7%), single male poverty (13.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and single father poverty (16.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 13.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 12.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 12.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 34.4%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.2%), and married-couple households (47.3% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.050%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.22, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (62.9% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 25.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 17.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 0.27%), no vehicles in household (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.83%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 44.2%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 38.1%), and master's degree (19.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.55%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.59%), and 4th grade (97.9% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 21.1%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 14.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.45%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.59%), and male disability (11.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.0%).