Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Immigrants from Zaire Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,149,618 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zaire within Immigrant from Bangladesh communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.170. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bangladesh within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Immigrants from Zaire. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bangladesh corresponds to an increase of 9.5 Immigrants from Zaire.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,714 compared to $45,529, a difference of 20.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,448 compared to $78,045, a difference of 15.9%), and median household income ($80,722 compared to $71,801, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($55,394 compared to $54,512, a difference of 1.6%), median family income ($94,665 compared to $89,285, a difference of 6.0%), and wage/income gap (20.9% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 32.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 31.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (16.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.18%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 0.72%), and poverty (15.3% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 37.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 35.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 12.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.0% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 35.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.6% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.8%), divorced or separated (11.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 16.0%), and births to unmarried women (30.9% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.2%), currently married (43.6% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and average family size (3.36 compared to 3.22, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (25.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 130.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 33.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (38.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.3% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 19.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 30.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (38.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 32.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 38.5%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 8.5%), and master's degree (15.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.22%), associate's degree (45.2% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 0.59%), and nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.85% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 33.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 26.6%), and hearing disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.4%).