Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Filipino Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,872,684 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Filipinos within Immigrant from Eastern Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.603. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Africa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in Filipinos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Africa corresponds to a decrease of 14.7 Filipinos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,458 compared to $128,723, a difference of 40.7%), median male earnings ($53,713 compared to $74,224, a difference of 38.2%), and median household income ($84,299 compared to $115,509, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,158 compared to $57,740, a difference of 12.9%), median female earnings ($40,644 compared to $49,508, a difference of 21.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,157 compared to $76,686, a difference of 25.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (17.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 59.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 58.1%), and receiving food stamps (11.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 56.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 4.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 16.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.55%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 27.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 71.4%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (68.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 45.7%), births to unmarried women (31.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 34.7%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.46%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and family households (61.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 20.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 15.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.7% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.50%), no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.7% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 62.9%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 57.2%), and master's degree (16.3% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 43.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.45%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.45%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 40.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 30.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 3.9%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.5%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.1%).