Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,448,972 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Immigrant from Eastern Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.237. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Africa corresponds to an increase of 5.4 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 22.1%), per capita income ($43,838 compared to $52,649, a difference of 20.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,458 compared to $108,926, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,158 compared to $52,783, a difference of 3.2%), median female earnings ($40,644 compared to $43,941, a difference of 8.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,157 compared to $67,326, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (9.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 34.4%), married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 33.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.0%), single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 9.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.4% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 9.8%), and unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.29%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.30%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (68.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 29.4%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.9%), and births to unmarried women (31.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.1% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 2.6%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.11, a difference of 3.6%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 7.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.7% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.22%), no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.7% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 57.1%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 29.8%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.91%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.92%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 14.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 11.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.4% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.080%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.98%), and disability (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.4%).