Immigrants from Iraq vs Immigrants from Grenada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,659,958 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada within Immigrant from Iraq communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.258. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Iraq within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.027% in Immigrants from Grenada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Iraq corresponds to an increase of 26.7 Immigrants from Grenada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 65.0%), householder income over 65 years ($59,824 compared to $50,747, a difference of 17.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,201 compared to $85,552, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($41,365 compared to $41,123, a difference of 0.59%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,444 compared to $88,311, a difference of 1.3%), and median earnings ($44,988 compared to $45,596, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 55.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 52.3%), and receiving food stamps (12.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 7.7%), single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 8.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 51.3%), male unemployment (5.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 42.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 41.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 6.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 8.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.4% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 55.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 13.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.56%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.69%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 35.6%), births to unmarried women (27.1% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 33.8%), and married-couple households (47.3% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.5%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.2%), and family households (65.0% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 401.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 139.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 122.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.5% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 47.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.1% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 102.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 122.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 23.7%), no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 15.2%), and college, under 1 year (66.3% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.38%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 43.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.74%), female disability (12.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age over 75 (49.1% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.4%).