Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from Grenada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,140,783 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.146. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Grenada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to a decrease of 0.6 Immigrants from Grenada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 63.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,343 compared to $85,552, a difference of 43.0%), and median family income ($125,312 compared to $89,249, a difference of 40.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $54,538, a difference of 6.8%), median female earnings ($46,481 compared to $41,932, a difference of 10.8%), and median earnings ($56,253 compared to $45,596, a difference of 23.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 84.7%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 60.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.3% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 60.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.6% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 8.1%), single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 14.1%), and single male poverty (11.3% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 48.6%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 45.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 25.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 59.6%), births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 43.7%), and married-couple households (48.7% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.0%), family households (65.1% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 166.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 135.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 110.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 37.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 85.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 110.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 112.3%), professional degree (6.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 74.3%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 46.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.36%), 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.37%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 29.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 25.3%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 3.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 6.1%).