Immigrants from Jordan vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,379,144 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.351. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.187% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to an increase of 186.7 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($57,145 compared to $49,711, a difference of 14.9%), per capita income ($45,066 compared to $39,558, a difference of 13.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,164 compared to $93,991, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($63,041 compared to $60,748, a difference of 3.8%), householder income under 25 years ($51,370 compared to $54,000, a difference of 5.1%), and median female earnings ($40,977 compared to $38,202, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 45.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 35.6%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 5.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 63.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 62.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 61.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 14.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 25.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 28.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 59.6%), births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 32.2%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.090%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.37, a difference of 4.0%), and currently married (47.4% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 101.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 13.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 5.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 6.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 41.2%), master's degree (16.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 39.1%), and no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.8% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.15%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.8% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and 11th grade (93.1% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 159.8%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 55.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.6%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 8.0%).