Immigrants from Laos vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,313,728 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.183. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to a decrease of 24.3 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $54,000, a difference of 7.9%), householder income over 65 years ($56,722 compared to $60,748, a difference of 7.1%), and per capita income ($37,857 compared to $39,558, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($49,190 compared to $49,711, a difference of 1.1%), median household income ($78,327 compared to $79,509, a difference of 1.5%), and median earnings ($42,884 compared to $43,750, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 20.3%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 18.6%), and receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (19.4% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 1.0%), single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and female poverty (15.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 65.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 65.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 55.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 21.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 25.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 22.5%), births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 12.6%), and single mother households (7.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (29.8% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 0.070%), family households (65.3% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.36%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 113.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 10.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 4.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 6.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 113.6%), associate's degree (40.7% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 8.5%), and bachelor's degree (31.6% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (61.3% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 1.4%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 134.3%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 41.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.35%), ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 3.0%).