Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,610,963 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Canadians within Immigrant from Kazakhstan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.486. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Kazakhstan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.612% in Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Kazakhstan corresponds to an increase of 612.0 Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 8.2%), median female earnings ($42,386 compared to $39,724, a difference of 6.7%), and per capita income ($48,747 compared to $45,858, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,292 compared to $62,230, a difference of 0.10%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,378 compared to $104,560, a difference of 2.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,990 compared to $52,336, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 15.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 15.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (15.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.37%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.62%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 18.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.32%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.2% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 14.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.1% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 13.6%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.1%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.74%), average family size (3.17 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.97%), and currently married (47.4% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 62.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 24.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.6% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 6.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.6% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 13.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 20.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 25.9%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.4%), and master's degree (18.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.0% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 0.10%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.9% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.46%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 36.9%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 18.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.58%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.8%).